【禁闻】郭美美上时尚杂志 约九成网友抵制
| 新唐人电视 www.ntdtv.com 2011-9-15 06:52 |
【新唐人2011年9月15日讯】�炫富女�郭美美，日前接受时尚杂志等媒体专访。载有�郭美美从未想做全民公敌�的杂志文章 曝光后，郭美美与中国慈善组织再度成为网上讨论热点。有网民痛斥杂志缺乏道德底线，号召民众抵制。作家任晓雯也批评杂志�伤害了全体纳税人的感情�、�是 一种漠视民意的无底线�作法。请看报导。
郭美美继炫富事件后，有关她的专访出现在最新一期的时尚杂志《嘉人 Marie Claire》中。杂志打着�独家专访�、以�郭美美从未想做全民公敌�作文章内页标题。杂志内容曝光后，网友对郭美美上时尚杂志持反对态度，大众矛头直 指杂志社，认为杂志社与郭美美互相利用炒作，是漠视民意底线的行为。
浙江前《海洋报》记者昝爱宗表示，只要记者本着真实的报导，不要替郭美美美化，记者是有采访的自由。
昝 爱宗：“这个记者在采访的时候，是不是原话照登。比喻，她（郭美美）说了谎言，记者如果认为她说的是谎言，应该给她揭露出来，不能是听她的一面之词。比喻 她说她很有钱是搓麻将，打麻将打出来的，你玩麻将不可能发财的。她有那么多钱？比喻200万的汽车，不可能靠打麻将能买出来的。”
不过，网站的一份调查中，87%的网友对郭美美上时尚杂志持反对态度。
作家任晓雯表示，“看到郭美美上杂志，顿感无语。她认为杂志社伤害了全体纳税人的感情。是利用郭的‘名气’进行商业牟利，是一种漠视民意的无底线。”
另外，郭美美事件后，大陆公众对慈善组织产生了�极大的不信任和失望情绪�，全国慈善组织也出现了信心和经济危机。
国际天灾研究会会长李伯淳表示，最近这一段时间，中国的慈善、包括红十字会、中华慈善总会等等，在中国引起了各方面的关注。
李伯淳：“目前一个是象红十字会的捐款的透明度不够，人们对捐款的去向有些担忧。现在中国的慈善事业应该有一个更好的监管，同时有一个更加透明的政策。”
民 政部�中民慈善捐助信息中心�提供的数据显示，近几个月慈善组织接收捐款总额较3至5月急降近九成，金额差距达50多亿。北京市红十字会披露的数据显示， 今年7月，共接受捐款总计15.44万元；与去年的756万元比较，差距巨大。深圳市红会的捐赠额也由5月的50,000多元下降到7月的 5,335元；河南省红十字会今年7月只收到一笔5,295元的捐款。
昝爱宗：“红十字会公信力严格受损，受损以后，郭美美和红十字会绑在一起，就让人感觉到郭美美是伪慈善，红十字会也是伪慈善。所以它这一两个月，这郭美美事件以来，尤其是8月份，红十字会的收入锐减一下子减了很大的程度。”
昝爱宗认为，民意决定着红十字会的生存，如果红十会的信誉太差，民意就投反对票，那红十字这个机构就生存不下去了。
新唐人记者唐睿、王明宇采访报导。
Guo Meimei’s Interview Infuriates Netizens
Anchor: Material-girl, Guo Meimei, was recently interviewed
by China’s Marie Claire magazine and other media.
The article titled, "Guo Meimei Has Never Thought
of Herself as a Public Enemy,"
revealed Guo’s relationship with the Red Cross Society of China,
igniting a firestorm of controversy.
Netizens criticized the magazine’s lack of moral values
and called for a boycott.
. Writer, Ren Xiaowen, also criticized the magazine saying it
“hurt the feelings of all taxpayers,”
adding that the magazine is
“eroding the baseline of morality.”
The Marie Claire magazine printed an exclusive interview,
titled: "Guo Meimei Has Never Thought of Herself As a Public Enemy."
Netizens strongly reacted to the article saying
that the magazine helped Guo succeed in the entertainment industry, ignoring public opinion.
Former China Ocean News reporter, Zan Aizong,
expressed that as long the reporter reported the truth,
there should not be a problem with the interview.
Zan Aizong: “Whether the report did or didn’t reflect Guo’s views,
if she lied, the reporter is still responsible for exposing the lie.
In addition, he shouldn’t base his news story on one single-source.
Guo said her money all came from playing Mahjong,
but it is not realistic that one would become as wealthy as
she did by simply playing Mahjong.
She has so much money,
including a 2 million yuan (US$313,000) luxury car.
It is literally impossible to earn that much money
by playing Mahjong!”
An Internet survey reported that 87% of netizens didn’t believe
Guo’s story when she was interviewed by Marie Claire magazine.
Writer Ren Xiaoxia: “I was speechless
when I read Guo’s cover story in the magazine.”
Ren said the magazine hurt taxpayer’s feelings.
The magazine benefited by the interview,
as many people are interested in following Guo’s story,
despite the fact that most people don’t believe her.
In addition, the public now distrusts charitable organizations,
including the national Red Cross in China,
which is facing both a credibility and economic crisis.
International Natural Hazard Research Association chairman,
Li Bochun, recently stated: “The China Charity organization,
including the Red Cross and the China Charity Federation,
have come under increasing public scrutiny.”
Li Bochun: “At present, the Red Cross’ transparency policy,
regarding incoming donations, is not enough,
as people are concerned about
how their donations are being used.
The China Charity organization should have been
better managed, with even greater transparency.”
Ministry of Civil Affaires’ data shows that in recent months,
the donations received by charity organizations
have dropped by 90% from March to May,
a difference of about 50 billion yuan (US$7.8 billion).
The Beijing Red Cross said that in July,
it received a total of 154,000 yuan (US$ 24,092),
compared to last year’s total of 7.56 million yuan (US$1,182,580).
Shen Zhen Red Cross donations totalled 50,000 yuan (US$7,821)
in May but dropped down to 5,335 yuan (US$834) in July,
while the Henan Province Red Cross only received
5,295 yuan (US$828) in July.
Zan Aizong: “People now associate Guo with the Red Cross,
which has greatly damaged the credibility of the charitable organization.
Now, the public doesn’t believe either one of them.
Since the Guo Meimei incident,
Red Cross’ income has dropped dramatically, especially in August.”
Zan Aizong believes that public opinion will decide whether
or not the Red Cross will survive.
If it acquires a bad reputation, the public will not support it,
thus, the Red Cross will cease to exist in China.
NTD reporters Tang Rong and Wang Mingyu
| 相关标签 | 郭美美  Facebook  Twitter  Digg  del.icio.us |
网址转载： --
您收到此邮件是因为您订阅了 Google 网上论坛的“参考消息(G4G)”论坛。
要向此网上论坛发帖，请发送电子邮件至 go2group@googlegroups.com。
要取消订阅此网上论坛，请发送电子邮件至 go2group+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com。
若有更多问题，请通过 http://groups.google.com/group/go2group?hl=zh-CN 访问此网上论坛。
没有评论:
发表评论